Supreme Court Wantonly Promotes Drug Use2007-06-26 21:32:47
When the Supreme Court ruled yesterday that a public school principal had the right to restrict the free speech of a student in a public setting outside the classroom, it justified its anti-free-speech ruling by claiming a higher priority: preventing the spread of pro-drug messages. You see, said the Supreme Court, the public interest is served by quashing whatever might be possibly interpreted as expressing a pro-drug sentiment, so not only is the right of someone to express that possibly pro-drug sentiment is overruled, but a person expressing a possibly pro-drug sentiment can be punished, too.
A reasonable person would not conclude that the words “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” really express the notion that, if Jesus returns any day now, we should lend him our water pipe. A reasonable person capable of some reflection would not conclude that the words “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” are a sincere suggestion that good Christian folk should get high as often as possible if they l